In his interview with the editorial board for the Community Newspapers Company (posted August 30, 2010), my opponent Mike Rush was asked about debating me, Michael F. Walsh. I have outspokenly requested several debates prior to the democratic primary on September 14th. Rush responded:
“Going to Dunkin Donuts and (having) a street brawl debate, I don’t think that anyone benefits from it.”
Those words are condescending and egotistical, especially since on September 1, 2010, I attended a candidate forum for the Suffolk and Norfolk District Senate seat hosted by the Newbridge on the Charles in Dedham, moderated by Dorothy Kelly-Gay, a respected professional and former Mayor of Somerville.
All of the State Senate candidates attended and each was provided with the topics to be covered 24 hours in advance of the forum. The moderator complimented the parties on their demeanor and professionalism toward each other. The format was not a debate style that has been requested numerous times and deserved by the voters. Rush does want to give the voters an opportunity to hear the democratic candidates, except at a “formalized, sanctioned debate,” which he also stated to the CNC.
Despite assertions, Rush has failed to contact those in the community who could easily call for a “formalized sanctioned debate” such as the League of Women Voters or the Ward 20 Democratic committee to which Rush belongs.
The manner in which I have conducted myself throughout this campaign directly contradicts Rush’s baseless assertion that any debate, would be a “street brawl.” The frustration of Rush’s failure to give the voters the respect they deserve and debate the issues as well as his attempt to blame me for that failure, is an insult not only to me, but more so to my family, my parents and in-laws and my supporters. Any such assertion is baseless and insulting, and another example of how a Beacon Hill insider, such as Rush, demonstrates unacceptable behavior and entitlement.
They wonder why the rest of us are enraged to vote incumbents out.
If Rush chooses not to debate, which is apparent from his failure to answer my email requests and numerous public requests, voters may draw an unreasonable inference from Rush’s “street brawl” remark about me and my candidacy and for that reason I demand an apology.
Michael F. Walsh
Candidate for State Senate, Suffolk Norfolk District
Related Articles
- Brad Williams and Michael Rush to Debate on BNN TV, October 27th, 7pm
- Brad Williams challenges Mike Rush to sign the No New Taxes Pledge
- Brad Williams Calls for Five Debates with Mike Rush
- Senate candidate Michael Walsh seeks debates with Mike Rush
- Brad Williams Comments on Rep. Mike Rush’s Lack of Accessibility
- Mike Walsh challenges Rep. Mike Rush on lack of accessibility to voters
- Mike Walsh Announces Candidacy for Suffolk and Norfolk State Senate
- Brad Williams Calls on Mike Rush to Address Probation Department Scandal
- Suffolk & Norfolk Senate District Candidates: Rush, Walsh, Williams
- Mike Rush running against Marian Walsh
Tags: Massachusetts, Mike Rush, Mike Walsh, Suffolk and Norfolk State Senate District
-
http://topsy.com/massachusetts-election-2010.com/4418/senate-candidate-michael-walsh-calls-for-an-apology-from-opponent-mike-rush/?utm_source=pingback&utm_campaign=L2 Tweets that mention Senate candidate Michael Walsh calls for an apology from opponent Mike Rush « Massachusetts Election 2010 — Topsy.com
-
http://lmtpolitics.com/2010/09/03/street-brawl/ Street Brawl in Suffolk, Norfolk Senate Race? I’d watch it… « Lovers Muggers and Thieves
